Bromocriptine Addendum by Lyle McDonald
Since completing my little book, a number of issues have arisen
that I somehow failed to address the first time around. Most of
these got covered in the addendum/FAQ that I added to the booklet
but there is apparently one issue making the rounds of some of the
message boards that I somehow overlooked. That issue involves a
possible effect of bromocriptine in lowering testosterone levels,
as reported in one study (1). There has also been some banter regarding
some of the possible mechanisms involved. In this short article,
which I'll be adding to the book of course, I want to address the
issue, mainly to put everybody's freaking mind's to rest.
Some Basics of the System
To understand the data I want to look at, I need to sketch out
the basics of how the human body handles gonadal hormone production.
All of the information I'm going to present comes from reference
2. It can be found in any basic endocrinology textbook. For ease,
I'll give you a graphic with the basics of the system.
Hormonal production starts, as usual, in the brain. In this case,
the main hormone of interest is called gonadotrophin releasing hormone
(GnRH), which is released from the hypothalamus. I should note that
both dopamine and prolactin have effects on GnRH, inhibiting it's
release. GnRH goes to the pituitary where it causes the release
of both leutinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone (LH
and FSH respectively). LH binds to a specific LH receptor in the
testes (the Leydig cells to be exact) and is the main player in
testosterone and estradiol (one of the estrogens) production in
men, and estradiol production in women. Both testosterone and estradiol
levels feedback on LH, inhibiting its release. FSH is mainly involved
in sperm production in men and has far more complex roles in women.
There's also much more to the overall regulation but these are the
main parts that are important here. The basic scheme appears below.
The Direct Research on Bromocriptine, Testosterone and
Other Hormones
In reporting the results of the Oseko et. al. (1) study which showed
a decrease in testosterone with chronic bromocriptine use, a number
of internet pundits have managed to avoid several other papers showing
different results. In this section, I want to address each in some
detail. I should note that all of these studies were done in normal,
otherwise healthy males (with one exception) since that's the group
we're really concerned with.
I'll summarize in a table below for easier reading. For reasons
you'll see in a second, I'm going to look at them from shortest
to longest duration and I'll give as much information as the studies
themselves gave. You'll see that, in many cases, it's somewhat incomplete
which makes drawing conclusions a bit tough.
In one study (3), Jacobs et. al. gave methysergide throughout the
day to inhibit prolactin release for one day. No effect on testosterone
levels were noted. In another (4), 6 males were given 2.5 mg of
bromocriptine at night for 3 days. Testosterone levels increased
in direct relationship to the decrease in prolactin. The same study
increased prolactin levels with the drug sulpiride and noted a decrease
in testosterone levels.
Lacritz et. al. (5) gave 5 males 2.5 mg of bromocriptine at night
for 6 days. There was no change in testosterone. Coiro et. al. (6)
gave 11 males 5 mg of bromocriptine in divided doses for 7 days;
there was no change in testosterone levels. Martikainen et. al.
(7) tested both decreased and increased prolactin in their study
in response to a hCG test. Sulpiride was used to increase prolactin
for 6 days and testosterone levels were increased although it was
non-significant. Bromocriptine was then given to 7 males, at 2.5
mg for 3 days followed by 5 mg for 10 days in divided doses. No
change in testosterone levels occurred in response to lowered prolactin.
In the first Oseko et. al. study, 5 normal men, aged 20 to 35 years
of age were given 5 mg of bromocriptine per day to reduce prolactin
levels for a period of 8 weeks. I want to note that the paper did
not indicate when the bromocriptine was given. It can be safely
assumed that it was either given all at night or in divided doses
as that would tend to have the greatest overall effect on prolactin.
A testosterone stimulation test (via the injection of human chorionic
gonadotropin stimulation or hCG) was performed at 2 week intervals
during the study. Measurements of basal testosterone, prolactin,
leutinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)
were also made. As expected, prolactin was reduced to the low end
of the normal range. Levels of LH and FSH did not change during
the study. However, both basal levels of testosterone and hCH stimulated
testosterone levels were reduced in all subjects at all time points
(2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks).
In a related study (8), Oseko et. al. looked at the LH release
from the pituitary gland in response to GnRH injection after 8 weeks
of bromocriptine treatment. They showed that LH release was not
affected by bromocriptine. So any effect of bromocriptine on testosterone
levels in reference 7 was most likely an effect at the testes themselves.
Finally, Glatthaar et. al. (9) gave 7.5 mg of bromocriptine (timing
was not indicated) in 10 males who had normal prolactin levels but
were infertile. The bromocriptine was given for 4 months and no
change in testosterone levels was noted. These studies are summarized
in table 1 below.
Table 1: Summary of studies on bromocriptine
and testosterone
Frankly, I can't make any more sense out of this data than I imagine
the people reading it can. Out of 8 studies, 7 of which measured
testosterone levels, one showed a decrease, two showed an increase
and most showed no effect (I should mention that there were one
or two additional studies that I couldn't obtain at the library
but I wanted to get this article out instead of waiting on them).
Hardly a clear-cut case.
I put them in order from shortest to longest to see if there was
any clear effect of duration. That is, while bromocriptine might
have one effect in the short-term, longer-term effects might be
different. Unfortunately, the last study by Glatthaar throws that
for a loop; it was the longest of them all with the highest dose
of bromocriptine and showed no change in testosterone. Of course,
since these were infertile men, it's possible that there was already
some other defect present, so the bromocriptine wasn't having any
additional effect. And one study in the 70's suggested a linkage
between below normal prolactin and low-testosterone in infertile
men (10). As well, because of a lack of information in the full
studies, there's no apparent pattern in the timing of the bromocriptine.
I'm going to talk about a few other things but I'll come back to
this.
The Mechanism
Since the direct research on bromocriptine and testosterone doesn't
seem to be giving any real clear pattern, let's look at possible
mechanisms. Considering that the main effect of bromocriptine is
on prolactin (ignoring the effects I talked about in the book),
it's fairly safe to assume that any changes in testosterone levels
are related to changes in prolactin through one mechanism or another.
Another possibility would be a direct effect on GnRH (see figure
1 above) since dopamine inhibits GnRH release.
Now, there's no doubt that hyperprolactinemia (higher than normal
prolactin levels) causes problems with hormones. This includes infertility,
low testosterone and a whole host of other problems. In that group,
where prolactin is chronically above normal, normalizing prolactin
invariably corrects hormones. Frankly, it never really occurred
to me that lowering prolactin below normal would cause problems.
Which is strange since I presented a roughly identical idea (that
both high and low levels of a hormone can cause the same problem)
in that book. What can I say, I'm a space case sometimes.
So what might the mechanism be for lower than normal prolactin
levels lowering testosterone. As mentioned above, earlier studies
suggest a correlation of below normal prolactin and low testosterone
(10). Other studies suggest that the increase in prolactin is involved
in stimulating testosterone release (11). This raises the question
of what the mechanism of action might be. I'll discuss some possibilities
here although you'll see that it really doesn't matter in the next
section.
One possibility, and the one that folks on the message boards seem
to be fixated on has to do with a possible role of prolactin in
regulating the LH receptor in the testes. That is, normal prolactin
seems to be necessary to keep LH receptor levels at the proper levels;
reducing prolactin far below normal could reduce the sensitivity
of the testes to LH, which would reduce testosterone output.
Now, if you're talking about rats or hamsters, there's absolutely
no doubt that normal prolactin levels are crucial to keeping LH
receptor levels normal. Unfortunately, in humans it's not quite
so clear. It turns out that prolactin has quite drastically different
effects in different species so this really isn't a place where
it's automatically safe to assume that what happens in rats happens
in humans (12). Frankly, despite thorough searching, I was unable
to find a direct link between prolactin levels and LH receptor regulation
in humans. The most recent review (13) makes no mention of prolactin
in regulation LH receptor number or function. White this doesn't
mean that it's not a possibility that prolactin is required for
normal LH receptor function in humans, but there's no data that
I can find.
So what about other possible mechanisms? It turns out that there
are a couple of possibilities that the folks on the webboards appear
to have missed (but I didn't because I'm OCD). One of the studies
cited above (7), mentioned one of them. In response to sulpiride
(which increased testosterone), the researchers also noted a smaller
decrease in estrogen in response to hCG stimulation. They suggest
that prolactin may exert an inhibitory effect on the enzyme aromatase
(which converts testosterone to estrogen). If that were the case,
lowering prolactin below normal might allow greater conversion of
testosterone to estrogen which would be bad for most males for a
whole bunch of different reasons.
A third possibility is that prolactin may exert inhibitor effects
on the enzyme 5-alpha reductase, which converts testosterone to
it's 'evil' twin DHT (di-hydro testosterone). One of the studies
above (5) showed a greater increase in DHT with hCH stimulation
after bromocriptine, suggesting this as an effect. Hyperprolactinemia
(above normal prolactin) is known to inhibit 5-alpha reductase (14)
so it's possible that below normal prolactin would allow increased
enzyme activity. However, another of the studies (7) found no effect
of low prolactin on the production of DHT. As with the conversion
of testosterone to estrogen, an excess of conversion of testosterone
to DHT would be distinctly bad.
Again, it's all about timing.
Ok, so there's no clear consensus on what, if any, effect below
normal prolactin might be having in terms of testosterone levels.
But, for the sake of argument, and so I can dismiss the whole issue
anyhow, let's assume something is going on. That is, through whatever
mechanism, it does appear that too low of prolactin can be just
as bad as too high. Basically ,whether normal prolactin is necessary
to maintain LH receptor number, inhibit aromatase, or inhibit 5-alpha
reductase, let's just assume that normal prolactin is important
and move on from there.
So we have to look at another issue, pattern of prolactin release.
That is, is it possible to take bromocriptine (to get the beneficial
effects described in my book) without affecting prolactin enough
to cause problems with testosterone. The answer turns out to be
yes, and it's quite easy.
Many hormones in the body follow fairly typical daily rhythms.
That is, outside of the other regulating factors, they tend to synchronize
with time of day (usually set by sleep patterns and light levels).
Prolactin is one of these hormones. Under normal circumstances,
prolactin levels peak during sleep, increasing from rather low levels
from about 2 am until maybe 10 am or so. At that point they return
to low levels and stay there pretty much all day long (15). So why
is this important? Because timing of bromocriptine is crucial in
determining whether or not prolactin levels are going to be affected.
Recall from my book that bromocriptine has a half-life of around
12 hours or so. This is why dosing for the treatment of high prolactin
levels. They are trying to maintain dopamine receptor stimulation
throughout the day to keep prolactin levels down.
But what about in normals? In a normal individual, prolactin will
peak in the morning, I as I mentioned above. The only way that bromocriptine
is going to affect that normal increase in prolactin is if it's
taken at night, to prevent the normal sleep-induced increase. Meaning
that my recommendation to take bromocriptine in the morning turns
out to be that much more important (even as a space-case, sometimes
I get lucky). By dosing first thing in the morning, not only are
most of the side effects avoided, not only do you get the metabolic/body
recomposition effects, but the normal morning rise in prolactin
levels aren't affected.
Bingo, no problem with testosterone because the normal prolactin
peak still occurs. I suppose if you were particularly concerned,
you might want to move your bromocriptine dose to 10 am, to make
sure that the normal prolactin peak still occurs. Beyond that, as
long as bromocriptine isn't dosed in the evening, normal prolactin
release will occur, and there should be no problems with testosterone
production. So all of the mental energy that folks put into worrying
about bromocriptine and testosterone can be safely swept away again:
as long as you take bromocriptine in the morning, allowing the normal
prolactin peak to occur, there should be no effect on testosterone.
I guess folks will have to find some other reason not to like me
now.
References cited
1. Oseko, F. et. al. Effects of chronic bromocriptine-induced
hypoprolactinemia on plasma testosterone responses to human chorionic
gonadotropin stimulation in normal men. Fertil Steril (1991) 55:
355-357.
2. Balint Kacsoh. Endocrine Physiology. McGraw
Hill Publishing, 2000.
3. Jacobs, LS. et. al. Failure of nocturnal
prolactin supression by methysergide to entrain changes in testosterone
in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1978) 46: 561-566.
4. Nakagawa K et. al. Relationship of changes
in serum concentrations of prolactin and testosterone during dopaminergic
modulation in males. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1982 17:345-52.
5. Lackritz, RM and A. Bartke. The effect of
prolactin on androgen response to human chorionic gonadotropin in
normal men. Fertil Steril (1980) 34: 140-143.
6. Coiro V. et. al. Restoration of normal gonadotropin
responses to naloxone by chronic bromocriptine treatment in elderly
men. Horm Res (1991) 36: 36-40.
7. Martikainen H. and R. Vihko. hCG-stimulaton
of testicular steroidogenesis during induced hyper- and hypoprolactinemia
in man. Clinical Endocrinology (1982) 16: 227-234.
8. Oseko F. et. al. Bromocriptine effects on
plasma leutinizing hormone and its responses to gonadotropin-releasing
hormone in normal men. Life Sciences (1993) 52: 1805-1807.
9. Glatthaar, C. et. al. pituitary function
in normoprolactinaemic infertile men receiving bromocriptine. Clinical
Endocrinology (Oxf.) (1980) 13: 455-459.
10. Pierrepoint, CG. et. al. Prolactin and testosterone
levels in the plasma of fertile and infertile men. J Endocrinology
(1978) 76: 171-172.
11. Rubin, RT. et. al. Prolactin-related testosterone
secretion in normal adult men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1976) 42:
112-116.
12. Bartke A. et. al. Effects of physiological
and abnormally elevated prolactin levels on the pituitary-testicular
axis. Med Biol 1986;63(5-6):264-72
13. Saez JM. Leydig cells: endocrine, paracrine,
and autocrine regulation. Endocr Rev. 1994 Oct;15(5):574-626.
14. Magrini B. et. al. Study on the relationship
between plasma prolactin levels and androgen metabolism in man.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1976 Oct;43(4):944-7
15. Linkowski, P. et. al. Genetic and environmental
influences on prolactin secretion during wake and during sleep.
Am J Physiol (1998) 274: E909-E919.
Return To Top
© 1997-2008 by QFAC, Inc. All rights reserved.
powered by Bodybuilding-QFAC
|